mo·​men·​tum


A publisher recently declined my manuscript but provided helpful constructive feedback.

I cut the first two-thirds (from ~35,000 words to ~13,000 words) and split the last essay across the beginning and end. I replaced essay titles with numbered chapters, which forced me to focus on sequencing/arc. Over the following days, I re-inserted essays that supported the new structure. It now sits at ~27,000 words, ~29,000 if I include autofiction.

Cutting the essays from Echoes gave the manuscript room to breathe and importantly, momentum. I now realise that I was getting hung up on linking my new essays to the old.

I have a synopsis, for the first time, and five new essays to write.

*

In an attempt to shake up my writing, I took a craft seminar with Isle McElroy on how novel (!) beginnings convey the arc of the book to follow and read Wonderlands by Charles Baxter, a collection of craft essays on fiction. Here are a few of my favourite quotes:

By exposing the ethical obligations that we feel we owe to others, request moments reveal what other people want from us and what their claim on us may be. Requests often force a choice that reveals our inner self, and they create narrative momentum by forcing a character to decide to do something when that person would rather not make any decisions at all. We often forget about urgency and momentum in workshops because we know that the supervisor and the workshop group have to finish the story. But in the real world, no one has to finish any literary work—not the poem, or the story, or the novel. Decisions, especially bad decisions, are the lifeblood of narrative.

/

A literary inventory, as opposed to any sort of list, is an accounting, a reckoning of possessions. And it seems to be in the nature of inventories to suggest not only what's been gained, but more properly what's about to be lost and what the prospects for further loss might be. ... Inventories give us an addition, but metaphorically and narratively they imply removal, de-acquisition, and nothingness—the subtraction effect of narrative undoing, which will imply the undoing of the character. You start with the accumulation, but you end up with an erasure.

/

When does a mere listing of objects acquire pathos and unexpected grandeur? At the moment when those objects are about to disappear, when they are about to be gone. ... It takes a certain act of curating, a certain gift of focused attention, to admit to the mind’s inner chamber a cigar box with the lid made into a pin cushion. The reader has to take on an inward quietism simply to read such a passage properly. Things about to disappear do not register when we are speed-reading; they just disappear faster. Any writer takes a risk in stopping time to preserve a moment and artifacts from the past, and none of it will work without love. But after all, every novel takes place in the past. When the book is printed, the narrative, whatever it is, is over.

/

If you want a story to support the weight of the characters’ feelings, it helps to keep things moving and to have a multiplicity of other characters. Stories cannot always support emotions without the force of lyric language, but the problem of too much lyric language in a narrative is that, without contrast, it clots the atmosphere. In a narrative, dramatic actions and the everyday objects in the setting will support and cause emotions. Let the objects and the actions carry the feeling. If you want to make a child’s sorrow dramatic, don’t spend time laboriously describing his feelings about his grandmother. Just have someone run over his bicycle.

/

The point of the image is not just image itself but its effect on our sense of time. Such lyric images can rarely support an entire story, because their very frozenness prevents them from yielding logically to a subsequent scene, and narrative is what happens in time, through time. … Stories and novels require connecting tissue, dialogue, and dramatic action that has consequences in other actions, not merely other images.

/

Anyone can write an image caught by chance, in silence, with nondirective action: such eloquent imagery is not hard to write. What’s hard is not forcing a meaning down its throat. If you let out your inner high school English teacher and force a meaning on your imagery, making the meaning explicit, the reader will read it, get it, and rush onward. But if there’s something widowed about the imagery, something that escapes meaning, the imagery will then stick to the reader, and begin to haunt.

Popular Posts